Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Romans is not only a letter about private belief or individual salvation. This introductory essay frames Romans as a public and communal text, asking how empire, hierarchy, exclusion, status, and prosperity logic shape the way people see one another, and how Paul’s message can retrain communities toward humility, hospitality, shared dignity, ecological accountability, and solidarity.

The Epistle to the Romans has often been interpreted primarily as a theological text about individual salvation, personal morality, or abstract doctrine. Yet Romans also addresses communities struggling with hierarchy, division, superiority, exclusion, public identity, and the pressures of life within the Roman Empire.
This series approaches Romans as a document of communal transformation.
Rather than reading Romans only through the lens of private belief, these essays explore how Paul speaks to questions that remain urgent today:
The essays in this series draw from historical-critical scholarship, empire-critical interpretation, feminist and anti-caste thought, ecological ethics, and public theology. They aim to make academic biblical scholarship accessible while remaining attentive to the social, political, ecological, and ethical questions that shape everyday life.
This is not a verse-by-verse commentary.
It is a public-facing exploration of Romans as a text about formation:
how communities learn to see one another,
how societies normalize hierarchy,
and how transformation becomes possible.
Romans begins not with private spirituality, but with the announcement of “good news” within an imperial world already filled with competing claims about power, peace, order, and salvation.
This essay explores:
Key themes:
Paul repeatedly critiques boasting throughout Romans.
But boasting is not simply arrogance. It reflects entire systems that organize human worth through superiority, honor, achievement, purity, ethnicity, or religious status.
This essay explores:
Key themes:
“Do not conform to the pattern of this world…”
Romans 12:2 is often interpreted as private self-improvement or personal spirituality. This essay instead explores transformation as communal relearning.
What kinds of worlds shape human perception?
How are communities trained to normalize hierarchy, fear, exclusion, and domination?
What forms of formation make solidarity possible?
Key themes:
Romans 14–15 addresses conflict between strong and weak within the Roman assemblies.
Rather than allowing superiority or judgment to fracture communal life, Paul repeatedly redirects communities toward patience, welcome, burden-bearing, and mutual care.
This essay explores:
Key themes:
Romans 16 introduces Phoebe as deacon, benefactor, and trusted emissary.
This essay explores how Phoebe challenges assumptions about leadership, visibility, authority, and communal responsibility in early Christianity.
Rather than leadership rooted in domination or prestige, Romans presents forms of service grounded in relational responsibility and shared flourishing.
Key themes:
Romans 12 describes forms of communal life rooted in sincerity, generosity, hospitality, non-retaliation, and care for others.
This essay explores Paul’s vision of love not as sentimentality, but as a difficult social practice capable of resisting systems built upon fear, competition, and exclusion.
Key themes:
The Roman Empire shaped people not only through political power, but through public imagination: spectacle, monuments, social hierarchy, military triumph, gendered visibility, and systems of honor.
This essay explores how public cultures teach people how to desire, aspire, compete, and judge, and how Romans resists these forms of formation.
Key themes:
Romans 8 presents creation itself as groaning under suffering and longing for liberation.
This essay explores:
Key themes:
Modern cultures often equate blessing with success, visibility, wealth, productivity, or upward mobility.
This essay explores how Romans challenges these assumptions and proposes forms of flourishing rooted instead in:
Key themes:
What might Romans say to a world marked by:
The final essay reflects on Romans as a resource for communities seeking forms of life grounded in solidarity rather than domination.
Key themes:
Romans has often been used to defend hierarchy, exclusion, nationalism, and systems of religious superiority.
This series seeks another approach.
It asks whether Romans can instead help communities relearn:
At its heart, this series asks a simple but difficult question:
What kinds of communities are we becoming together?